One thought on “DSCN2777 (Small)

  1. Steve You are right that BBC are required to asesss the application alone. However it seems strange for them to decide this application before having a core strategy in place and in isolation of the Stanton site which is predicted to SERIOUSLY ADD to the traffic load of the Jaguar mini roundabouts junction.Para 32 of the NPPF requires rejection of a proposal which will have a severe transport impact adding to an already over capacity junction that serves as the main access to the A52 for a large area should be considered as a severe impact on that ground alone the proposal should be rejected.The NPPF has a presumption in favour of SUSTAINABLE development and development that is unsustainable should be rejected. Perhaps you could consider whether sacrificing Greenbelt is justifiable IF there are other sites?One LibDem councillor seems to have recently realised the Greenbelt needs to be proactively and continually protected its status alone is not a sufficient shield against development. Perhaps you can make it two?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.